Transmembrane potential changes caused by monophasic and biphasic shocks.

نویسندگان

  • Xiaohong Zhou
  • William M Smith
  • Robert K Justice
  • James L Wayland
  • Raymond E Ideker
چکیده

Transmembrane potential change (Δ V m) during shocks was recorded by a double-barrel microelectrode in 12 isolated guinea pig papillary muscles. After 10 S1 stimuli, square-wave S2 shocks of both polarities were given consisting of 10-ms monophasic and 10/10-ms and 5/5-ms biphasic waveforms that created potential gradients from 1.1 ± 0.3 to 11.9 ± 0.4 V/cm. S2 shocks were applied with 30, 60- to 70-, and 90- to 130-ms S1-S2 coupling intervals so that they occurred during the plateau, late portion of the plateau, and phase 3 of the action potential, respectively. Some shocks were given across as well as along the fiber orientation. The shocks caused hyperpolarization with one polarity and depolarization with the opposite polarity. The ratio of the magnitude of hyperpolarization to that of depolarization at the three S1-S2 coupling intervals was 1.5 ± 0.3, 1.1 ± 0.2, and 0.5 ± 0.2, respectively. Δ V m during the shock was significantly greater for the monophasic than for the two biphasic shocks. The prolongation of total repolarizing time (TRT) was significantly greater for monophasic (119.8 ± 19.1%) and 10/10-ms biphasic (120.5 ± 18.2%) than for 5/5-ms biphasic (113.0 ± 12.9%) waveforms. The dispersion of the normalized TRT between instances of hyperpolarization and depolarization caused by the two shock polarities was 7.4 ± 7.1% for monophasic, 3.0 ± 4.1% for 10/10-ms biphasic, and 2.8 ± 3.1% for 5/5-ms biphasic shocks ( P < 0.05 for monophasic vs. biphasic). Shock fields along fibers produced a larger Δ V m and prolongation of TRT than those across fibers. We conclude that 1) a change in shock polarity causes an asymmetrical change in membrane polarization depending on shock timing; 2) the 5/5-ms biphasic waveform causes the smallest Δ V m, prolongs repolarization the least, and causes the smallest polarity-dependent dispersion; and 3) the changes in transmembrane potential and repolarization are influenced by fiber orientation.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Nonlinear changes of transmembrane potential during electrical shocks: role of membrane electroporation.

Defibrillation shocks induce nonlinear changes of transmembrane potential (DeltaVm) that determine the outcome of defibrillation. As shown earlier, strong shocks applied during action potential plateau cause nonmonotonic negative DeltaVm, where an initial hyperpolarization is followed by Vm shift to a more positive level. The biphasic negative DeltaVm can be attributable to (1) an inward ionic ...

متن کامل

Prolongation of repolarization time by electric field stimulation with monophasic and biphasic shocks in open-chest dogs.

Recent studies suggest that 1) electrically induced fibrillation and defibrillation involve prolongation of refractoriness by the shock in addition to stimulation and 2) biphasic waveforms are more efficient for defibrillation than are comparable monophasic waveforms. The purpose of this study was to compare prolongation of action potential duration at 50% repolarization by monophasic and bipha...

متن کامل

Action Potentials During Ventricular Fibrillation in Dogs

This study determined the response of action potentials during ventricular fibrillation (VF) to timed monophasic and biphasic shocks. A floating glass microelectrode was used to record intracellularly from the anterior right ventricle in 10 open-chest dogs. After 10 seconds of electrically induced VF, 5-millisecond monophasic and 2.5/2.5-millisecond biphasic shocks or 16-millisecond monophasic ...

متن کامل

Disparate effects of biphasic and monophasic shocks on postshock refractory period dispersion.

The magnitude by which a defibrillation shock extends the refractory period immediately postshock (refractory period extension, RPE) does not explain why biphasic shocks defibrillate with greater efficacy than monophasic shocks. It may be that spatial heterogeneity of RPE is a more important regulator of defibrillation efficacy. We measured RPE in 15 pentobarbital-anesthetized swine using 400-V...

متن کامل

CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE Comparison of monophasic and biphasic shocks for transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation

Objective: To compare the efficacy of cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation between monophasic damped sine waveform and rectilinear biphasic waveform shocks at a high initial energy level and with a conventional paddle position. Design: Prospective randomised study. Patients and setting: 227 patients admitted for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation to a tertiary referral centre. R...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology

دوره 275 5  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1998